Saturday, September 8, 2007

Warning Notice -- Update

This image from ABCNEWS (fair use applies) is suggestive of images reported by a DIA STAR GATE psychic spy in 1987.

It is interesting that in 1987, America's psychic spies were being tested to report on future events as part of secret tasking assignments involving so-called psychic spy remote viewing.

Project P involved tasking the psychic spies to obtain images of news stories in future editions of papers and magazines, like the Washington Post.
One result of Project P was the possible identification of a future newspaper archive called "Project 9/11."


Is it possible that the psychics were unable to control the time coordinates requested by the tasking instructions? Perhaps the associative nature of recalling future events inadvertently mixed details of news reports fifteen to twenty years into the future, in the same way a memory of an event is filled with images of similar events from different times. We might assume that repeating images, like the comparison of the old and new bin Laden in various media outlets, would carry more psychic 'weight' than others and would be more likely to be received.

Previous STAR GATE tasking experiments to remote view future news reports warned of aircraft being used as weapons against buildings.

2 comments:

Daz said...

Dude!
I think you are reaching. As a practicing remote viewer if you miss the target (in this case the target dates) or write target data - this cant then just arbitrarily be matched to future events as you see fit.

yes some viewers do have a bleed when viewer a target into different time zones for that target - but this is a rare occurance.

If ths target wasnt 'describe a future terrosist atack on the US or describe the ttack that will happen on 11/9/01' then its data that was off target. However interesting in may seem to be.

Daz Smith

Gary S. Bekkum / STARpod.org said...

Daz,

I don't know if you have looked at the DIA documentation about Project P. It appears that remote viewing future targets where tasking officers specified dates (generally the idea was to obtain newspaper headlines from future editions) was a failure.

That said, this session and others that appeared to obtain 9/11-like results, were the product of non-standard sessions or, in this case, SRV -- which I believe designated "Spontaneous Remote Viewing" meaning that the report was based on images and information that appeared in relation to a specific theme, like "future terrorist attacks." The Monroe Institute data was the product of experiments into altered states of consciousness. The 9/11 images of buildings and planes crashing were also SRV as the tasking officer notes that the remote viewer was driving home at the time of the vision.