Thursday, March 5, 2009

Col. John B. Alexander on the ALIEN REPRODUCTION VEHICLE


The following is reproduced here by permission of Colonel John B. Alexander:

This past weekend a conference was held to discuss the development of a new craft. Many of the attendees seem to believe that ARV, (the Alien Reproduction Vehicle), is real and being hidden from the public. FYI, I have challenged that thought in the following memo. Would be happy to learn if any of your followers had comments. Please pass widely. Thanx John A

The Ten Trillion Dollar Challenge
John B. Alexander, Ph.D.


For many years the proponents of the Alien Reproduction Vehicle (ARV) have suggested that some unidentified agency (THEY) has had control over a crashed UFO and were successful in reverse engineering that craft. According to this theory, THEY have controlled all access to information pertaining to ARV. Select versions of this story suggest that some, but not all, former presidents of the United States of America, have been allowed to have this knowledge. Exactly who makes the decisions about access to the information is never articulated, but the proponents are convinced that THEY exist. Speculation regarding control runs from some deep black governmental agency, to private industrial organizations, or even extra-governmental bodies which are totally devoid of oversight from either the Executive or Legislative branches of government.

Those not steeped in UFO conspiracy theory may not be aware that there exists a substantial body of published information that state that THEY have gained the scientific knowledge necessary to provide limitless energy at very low cost. Ostensibly, that advance was derived from the UFO crash at Roswell in 1947. According to this legend, once successfully reverse engineered, THEY intentionally blocked access to this knowledge in order to literally take over the world through domination of the macro socio-economic structures. Support for these theories go far beyond a few loose nuts and gain credibility through commentary by higly credentialed persons, such as a former Canadian Minister of Defense, active and retired military officers, and experienced researchers.

The evidence provided to support their conclusions of the existence of ARV involve a few, hard to substantiate, eye-witness accounts, and some low-quality videotape of questionable origin that purports to show an object morphing in an unusual manner. These same rumors suggest that ARV is housed at Area 51, or S-4 which are under US Government control in Southern Nevada.

Of course, development of such a craft infers intimate knowledge of some propulsion mechanism that is unknown to the traditional scientific community. If this has been accomplished, then development of a flying craft is minuscule compared with the true value of this monumental scientific breakthrough. Successful development of ARV means that a previously unknown energy source not only has been discovered, but has been engineered. Obviously, ARV is but one variation of use. However interesting ARV might be, it pales in comparison to other applications.

The main focus would be on energy generation. The proponents of the ARV thesis acknowledge this, and state that the rationale for keeping the new technology secret is so that THEY can dominate the energy market and make trillions of dollars through ownership of this technology. For the sake of discussion, we can set aside the argument that THEY have any legal jurisdiction over the application of such a breakthrough. Since the technology would have been derived, directly or indirectly, from US Government owned sources, the technology would belong rightfully to the American people.

However, since ARV does not exist, that position is moot. Prior to the 2008 national elections I stated publicly that if ARV were real, THEY would have revealed the existence of it in order to sway the elections in favor of the Republicans. As we all know, that revelation did not happen. Now there is another fact that has come to light that certainly argues most strongly against ARV. That is the decline in global wealth from 2007 through 2008. According to a report in BusinessWeek, during that period there was a real decline in global wealth amounting to about ten trillion dollars ($10T). While unstable financial situations played a significant role, at the heart of the loss was the volatility in global energy sources. To believe that THEY control ARV, means that THEY were willing to allow an eight percent decline in global wealth, while THEY had the capability to mitigate, or even reverse, this disastrous economic collapse. This is completely illogical and runs counter to the thesis that THEY were driven by greed and would use ARV technology to further their own economic interests. In fact, during the economic recession of 2008 (and continuing in 2009) more wealth was lost than THEY projected to make though introduction of the new energy source. Had THEY had access to ARV technology, there is no doubt that it would have been made public so that we could be! gin to c ounter the current global economic crisis. There simply is no sane rationale for continuing to allow further disintegration of the technologically developed world.

While it is said that it is impossible to prove a negative, the current economic meltdown comes about as close to proving that ARV does not exist as any argument could. The only alternative is to believe that THEY are prepared to allow national and global financial suicide, just to keep their secret. My ten trillion dollar challenge is for anyone to explain why that amount of money was willfully destroyed, if an answer was available.

As noted in my pre-election prediction, ET did not get the message and the rescue ship will not arrive in time to save us from ourselves. Therefore, we had all better get to bailing as hard as we can and come up with solutions to the energy and economic crises that we have.

(1 March 2009)

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

What an arbitrary argument, who's to say who THEY are or what their real agenda is or what they would do with their power in order to further their agenda. It is the socio-political system that keeps them in control at the top of the hierarchy, it doesn't matter about wealth, THEY are always going to have more than enough anyway. Things are rarely as simple as that argument made them.

Anonymous said...

Two thumbs down. Weak logical arguments on the link between ARV and the declining global wealth. When THEY own the planet, money is merely a token to control how people live on the planet.

Anonymous said...

"10 trillion dollars" or what ever arbitrary value you place on the (continuing) global economic "adjustment" means nothing compared to the potential for social and economic adjustment that would be required if the world would not need fossil fuels for energy. Ben Rich, who ran Lockheed's R&D Skunkworks group said, in 1993, "We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an Act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity...Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do."

Anonymous said...

The one thing that people don't realize about advance technology is that it is easier to create but much more difficult to control.

A prime example of this was during the Manhattan Project. Many top scientist believed it was possible to ignite the Earths atmosphere with the first atomic blast.

Now of course this sounds silly from today's perspective, but considering the new technologies and the power they can behold still takes the same consideration.

We have done many things in the past in the name of freedom that today may be considered totally idiotic. One example is the use of a highly toxic material in the fuel of military aircraft to hide their exhaust signature making them more stealthy. And without any regards to the hazards these materials compose to the troops and defense workers who ingested these materials on a daily basis. Another example is Agent Orange, we all know about that one.

Yes, it true that Ben Rich said we have the means to travel the stars. But, at what cost, are we prepared to poison our planet? What happens when our space ship travels to a distant World, crash lands and poisons their World?

My question to Col. Alexander would be-
Do you think the time has come when agencies like the CIA have decided to be more passionate, considerate to the human cause, and not be known as the spooks who cause bad things to happen? Will they develop a new PR persona, to be seen working for the common good of Americans and the human race?